|
THE
AVENGERS #19-22: ULTRON UNLIMITED.
Is
the acclaimed Busiek-Perez series really little more than a bad
soap?
Writer:
Kurt Busiek
Artists: George Perez, Al Vey
Colorist: Tom Smith
Letterer: Richard Starkings and Comicraft's Wes Abbott
4-issue story arc
Published by Marvel Comics 1999
$1.99 each
Reviewed
by Pindaros
The
Busiek-Perez run on THE AVENGERS is for many readers a
standard for quality writing and art in the superhero books. The
book has the hallmarks of "great storytelling" which is the supposed
virtue of the otherwise dismissible superhero genre: vivid characters,
gripping plots and realistic, yet emotionally expressive drawing.
It
is also a perfect example of why I got sick of superheroes when
I was 11.
Just
so you don't think I'm totally clueless, I can recognize the virtues
of Busiek's and Perez's work. Busiek knows Marvel history and
the Marvel characters, and shows real genius in developing innovative
and dramatic plots from the material he is given.
In
the 'Ultron Unlimited' story-arc of this last summer, the Avengers
battle all of the Ultrons they have ever encountered in the past,
and perhaps another 1000 or so in addition, and Busiek's expertise
allows him to give distinct voices to all of them. More significantly,
the story is a climatic moment in relationships between Hank Pym
and the Wasp, Pym and Ultron, Ultron and Vision, that have been
important threads in the tapestry of Avengers history since the
sixties.
Perez
is a useful partner in spinning this tale, given his consistent
success in evoking fantastic grandeur, horrifying destruction
and realistic human emotions. His mastery of the medium is particularly
apparent when one reflects on how practical his style is for dealing
with the flat color that comics were printed in when he started
out. It makes the most of flat color, using line-work that is
intricate and expressive, but leaves a maximum of white page space
for the colorist to work with. Pick up an old issue of NEW
TEEN TITANS and instead of pages that look cheap, you get
panels in which the flat color looks restrained and even realistic
within the bounds of Perez's lines.
| "Busiek comments
on personalities in a way that fills them out... but also
makes me less interested" |
While
this style was particularly apt for the '80's, Perez's work in
THE AVENGERS shows that it remains a powerful way of dealing
with the division of labor between penciller, inker and colorist.
The practical result is to offer greater autonomy for the colorist,
a freedom that colorist Smith uses to great effect. For instance,
when Thor pulverizes an Ultron, the inked lines present a sense
of metal being virtually liquified by the force of Thor's hammer,
while the color presents a study in blue and gray so that the
primary-colored Thor seems like a sun in a blue sky.
But
the obvious skill of Busiek and Perez really drives home to me
how insignificant quality is in drawing me into a comic. In the
rest of this review I want to articulate just what it is that
disappointed me about 'Ultron Unlimited,' and insofar as I'm typical
in having a fairly ambivalent relationship to comics, it might
help explain why superhero comics tend to appeal to a relatively
small society of readers.
I
want to start from that aspect of the story-telling that so many
readers feel marks Marvel's "maturity": the attempt to make the
superheroes in the comics as much like "real people" as possible.
In 'Ultron Unlimited,' there are a number of cases where Busiek
comments on the personalities of characters in a way that certainly
fills them out... but also makes me less interested in them.
One
instance occurs when the Avengers are set upon by a crowd of Ultrons,
and a scientist present thinks to herself (instead of running
away) that "Ultron's one of the Avengers' deadliest enemies, but
they didn't flinch! They just rely on their power, their experience."
In a similar incident, the Black Panther observes a new Avenger,
Firestar, and concludes that "She has the spirit of a true
Avenger."
With
such comments, Busiek depicts the Avengers as an exclusive club,
even a clique, that one joins by showing an ability and willingness
to fight against seemingly impossible odds.
Saving
the world and finding oneself a gang are placed on an equivalent
level, suggesting that adolescent social life is genuinely a matter
of life and death. Whether you're one of the cool kids is the
kind of concern that "real people" always have, at least if you're
living in the Marvel Universe.
A
quite different aspect of the story that bugs me is the depiction
of gender. This is not a matter of feminist fairness, but the
way that the gender roles in the story are so incredibly fixed.
Busiek's writing is completely locked into the male-warrior/female-nurturer
dynamic that Stan Lee brought to comics as a man of the World
War II generation.
Since
the first issue of THE FANTASTIC FOUR, Marvel comics have
generally ascribed more sophisticated emotional reactions to women.
Men are capable of anger, exuberance, self-doubt or despair (basically
expressions of whether their powers are going to explode or be
inadequate), but worry, affection, joy, pity and sadness all belong
almost exclusively to women. Aside from the contorted postures
meant to display butts and boobs, women's bodies in Marvel comics
have greater freedom in their postures for the expression of emotion.
'Ultron
Unlimited' locates human emotion entirely within this dichotomy.
The Scarlet Witch is portrayed with an almost liquid emotional
life, first when she folk-dances in a restaurant (female emotion
as spectacle) then later when she uses hex-power against Alkhema
(female emotion as destructive power.) In both cases her emotion
is portrayed as something that overwhelms her, so that she remains
fearful of it, although it has positive results.
| "The ultimate annoyance
of 'Ultron Unlimited' is exactly what fans probably consider
a virtue" |
The
Wasp's emotions are an even more crucial story-telling tool. From
her first appearance she is in an overwrought, but highly articulate,
state of hysteria. In explaining her fears for Henry Pym, she
provides the essential backstory for the story, which will explain
Ultron's actions and lay the groundwork for Pym's ultimate defeat
of his nemesis. This is especially important for the portrayal
of Pym's character, since in his more masculine state of emotional
disturbance, he is largely incoherent, even catatonic, throughout
much of the story.
In
contrast, most of the male Avengers are just action figures. Captain
America always deserves criticism in this respect, as an unimaginative
depiction of how male America feels about its manhood (in both
the literal and metaphorical sense of that word). The genius of
the Kirby-Simon original was that here was a guy who liked beating
the shit out of bad guys because they were his country's enemies.
I understand that things are more complicated than they were in
'39, but that should be a challenge for a writer, not an excuse
for why a character is boring.
The
ultimate annoyance of 'Ultron Unlimited' is exactly what many
fans probably consider a virtue: that these idiosyncratic ideas
about cliques and gender are depicted in a style that calls attention
to itself as "realistic." I like when Kirby and Ditko draw these
kind of stories, or when stylists like Liefeld and Bachalo do
them; by drawing in an overtly fantastic way, those artists create
space for the reader to reflect on the values presented, and enjoy
their presentation whether they share them or not. But with an
artist like John Buscema, John Byrne -- or George Perez -- you
start to get the sense that you're watching TV, at which point
the extreme emotions, the costumes and the threats of world domination
just seem excessive and silly.
All
the effort that Perez puts into detail and realism in THE AVENGERS
makes it feel like a soap opera, except that with a soap opera
writers draw drama out of fairly realistic situations. But thousands
of robots coming down from the sky, wiping out a small country,
and having the power to wipe out the world is a genuinely bizarre
situation that no amount of realistic art or characterization
can make plausible.
The
best superhero books explore those aspects of human character
that reflect encounters with bizarre, overwhelming situations.
To pretend that concerns about belonging and notions of women
as the bearers of all emotion are the essence of humanity that
is revealed in genuine disaster is a recipe for boring art.
Soap
operas leavened with genocide to make them seem more important
just won't cut it.
Recommended (with reservations: this is classic
Marvel, for better or worse)

Pindaros
is a regular contributor to PopImage.
Back
Attitude | ProFile
| Industrial
Interviews | Reviews
| Pi Comics
Talkback | Archives
| Gallery
|